gcpool
04-19 05:27 AM
I dont think we are doing any wrong here. I think it helps people. People can search who are the H1B and GC sponsoring companies. You can search about lawyers who have filed H1B and Green Cards.
wallpaper HAPPY NEW YEAR 2011
rajenk
10-10 04:46 PM
Carry all docs relevant to your current employment. Listing some.
1. EAD/H1B petition original
2. Employment letter from your current employer
3. If your current employer had filed/started GC process, then those document copies
You should be fine. When entering just answer the IO aptly. One common question is
1. Purpose of your visit?
2. Whom you are working for? <Be honest, tell them your current employer if asked>
If you are traveling on AP with family the above questions will be asked only to the primary person, they don't question others who are traveling with you.
1. EAD/H1B petition original
2. Employment letter from your current employer
3. If your current employer had filed/started GC process, then those document copies
You should be fine. When entering just answer the IO aptly. One common question is
1. Purpose of your visit?
2. Whom you are working for? <Be honest, tell them your current employer if asked>
If you are traveling on AP with family the above questions will be asked only to the primary person, they don't question others who are traveling with you.
vfx
07-09 11:52 AM
Is the 3yr extension based on an approved 140 transferrable to another employer for the full duration of 3 yrs?
2011 Happy New Year 2011
vatsa
01-04 10:38 AM
http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/jan2007/sb20070103_187304.htm?chan=search
The silence from those of us not affected by the green card process who are legal immigrants is annoyingly deafening. The entire economy has picked up now and yet legislation takes forever to pass!
What does it take for lawmakers to turn their heads? People holding placcards and signs on streets protesting? Is that the only way to have something heard? Obviously, written articles such as these isn't helping!
The silence from those of us not affected by the green card process who are legal immigrants is annoyingly deafening. The entire economy has picked up now and yet legislation takes forever to pass!
What does it take for lawmakers to turn their heads? People holding placcards and signs on streets protesting? Is that the only way to have something heard? Obviously, written articles such as these isn't helping!
more...
nkappiah
07-19 09:51 PM
I got married recently. Both my husband and I have similar priority dates as labour was filed separately for each of us by our respective companies. Is there any downside to adding each other to our applications and dual filing for greencard?
Is there any downside to having two applications in each name? Should we do this?
Thanks
N
Is there any downside to having two applications in each name? Should we do this?
Thanks
N
hibworker
05-07 01:55 PM
The job does not need to require Masters degree. Unlike Greencard filing under EB2 vs EB3 it is not any harder to get H1 under Masters quota, all you need is Masters from accredited univ. You need to figure out what the RFE is for.
more...
terpac
02-03 07:30 PM
This is EB2 and I had more that 6.5 yrs of experience at the time of labor filing.
The case is in NSC.
PD: Jan 07
I140 & 485 concurrent filing in July 07
Thanks!
The case is in NSC.
PD: Jan 07
I140 & 485 concurrent filing in July 07
Thanks!
2010 2011 Destop Wallpapers - Top
beautifulMind
11-20 12:56 PM
But I work in the same company and same dept..isn't AC21 only used if you quit GC sponsoring company
more...
plassey
08-22 04:00 PM
Some one did fact sheets, does this jive with the fact sheet?
Anyone got a chance to read this...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070822/pl_afp/usimmigrationeducation
Anyone got a chance to read this...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070822/pl_afp/usimmigrationeducation
hair Calendar 2011 Wallpapers
atlfp
04-13 09:13 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/13/washington/13cnd-bush.html?hp&ex=1144987200&en=5eab38dfea15243e&ei=5094&partner=homepage
If he really wants a plan, why would he want to irritate Democrats on this issue so much? What if the house democrats become so pissed off and block the vote in the house?
If he really wants a plan, why would he want to irritate Democrats on this issue so much? What if the house democrats become so pissed off and block the vote in the house?
more...
ivuser9
09-25 09:34 PM
we need to wait till we get the letter from USCIS to see what they requested for... it is typically an RFE
Good luck
Good luck
hot New Year Wallpapers always
apahilaj
09-24 03:30 PM
It depends on the I-140 you requested USCIS to consider while you aplied for I-485. There is some process called interifling, where you can later request USCIS to use the I-140 with better priority date against the I-485 so you can avoid multiple I-485.
hello Jai_Immigration,
I am in a similar situation and was wondering if you have any idea...I had applied for my 485 using an approved I140. Last year I had another I140 applied (since the first 140 application was about to get denied) and this application is still pending at USCIS. USCIS has sent an RFE on this second application last week (which my lawyer hasn't received yet).
Do you think this second I140 application will cause any effect on my 485 application? I had used my first 140 which was approved for my 485 application.
Thanks.
hello Jai_Immigration,
I am in a similar situation and was wondering if you have any idea...I had applied for my 485 using an approved I140. Last year I had another I140 applied (since the first 140 application was about to get denied) and this application is still pending at USCIS. USCIS has sent an RFE on this second application last week (which my lawyer hasn't received yet).
Do you think this second I140 application will cause any effect on my 485 application? I had used my first 140 which was approved for my 485 application.
Thanks.
more...
house Free New Year 2011 Calendar:
ChainReaction
03-06 01:58 PM
March 6, 2006
Dear XXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me in support of recapturing unused
employment-based immigrant visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for intracompany transferees. I apologize for
the delay in my reply, but I appreciate hearing from you and I
welcome the opportunity to respond.
I agree that the U.S. government should recapture unused
employment-based immigrant visas and impose immigration service
fees for those visas. As you may know, the United States Senate
version of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, S. 1932, included a
provision that would recapture up to 30,000 H-1B visas that had not
been issued in prior years. Also, S. 1932 would impose an additional
$500 fee to obtain these recaptured visas. These provisions were not
included in the House-passed version of the Deficit Reduction Act of
2005, H.R. 4241. Unfortunately, the Conference Committee, which
was responsible for resolving the differences between the House and
Senate versions of the bill, did not include this provision in the
final
version of S. 1932. The final version of S. 1932 passed in the House
by a vote of 216-214 on February 1, 2006. President Bush signed this
bill into law on February 8, 2006.
Please be assured that I will keep our shared support for
recapturing unused employment-based visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for these visas very much in mind as Congress
considers immigration issues.
Thank you again for contacting me. As your Representative in
the United States Congress, it is a privilege and an honor to serve you
and to act as your voice in Washington. Please feel free to contact me
again with any other issue or matter that concerns you. You may also
want to visit my website at www.house.gov/rothman where you can
sign up for my e-newsletter and keep current with my latest
Congressional activities and policy statements.
Sincerely,
Steven R. Rothman
Member of Congress
Another hopefull congressman to keep in touch with.:)
Dear XXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me in support of recapturing unused
employment-based immigrant visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for intracompany transferees. I apologize for
the delay in my reply, but I appreciate hearing from you and I
welcome the opportunity to respond.
I agree that the U.S. government should recapture unused
employment-based immigrant visas and impose immigration service
fees for those visas. As you may know, the United States Senate
version of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, S. 1932, included a
provision that would recapture up to 30,000 H-1B visas that had not
been issued in prior years. Also, S. 1932 would impose an additional
$500 fee to obtain these recaptured visas. These provisions were not
included in the House-passed version of the Deficit Reduction Act of
2005, H.R. 4241. Unfortunately, the Conference Committee, which
was responsible for resolving the differences between the House and
Senate versions of the bill, did not include this provision in the
final
version of S. 1932. The final version of S. 1932 passed in the House
by a vote of 216-214 on February 1, 2006. President Bush signed this
bill into law on February 8, 2006.
Please be assured that I will keep our shared support for
recapturing unused employment-based visas and imposing fees for
immigration services for these visas very much in mind as Congress
considers immigration issues.
Thank you again for contacting me. As your Representative in
the United States Congress, it is a privilege and an honor to serve you
and to act as your voice in Washington. Please feel free to contact me
again with any other issue or matter that concerns you. You may also
want to visit my website at www.house.gov/rothman where you can
sign up for my e-newsletter and keep current with my latest
Congressional activities and policy statements.
Sincerely,
Steven R. Rothman
Member of Congress
Another hopefull congressman to keep in touch with.:)
tattoo Free Zarine Khan New Year
kamand
01-04 11:41 PM
Hi,
I have my Employment based 485 Pending since Aug'2007 (EB-2, priority June'2006, India) and I am currently using EAD for my employment. I am married to a US citizen and have 130 approved on Dec'2008. I want to know what would be my next step.
Can I interfile the pending 485 with the approved 130? or Do I need to file a new 485 and withdraw the pending employment based 485 once I got the new EAD. or Do I need to go for counselor processing?
Please share your experience on this. Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
I have my Employment based 485 Pending since Aug'2007 (EB-2, priority June'2006, India) and I am currently using EAD for my employment. I am married to a US citizen and have 130 approved on Dec'2008. I want to know what would be my next step.
Can I interfile the pending 485 with the approved 130? or Do I need to file a new 485 and withdraw the pending employment based 485 once I got the new EAD. or Do I need to go for counselor processing?
Please share your experience on this. Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
more...
pictures Happy New Year Wallpaper 2011
Mogus
09-25 10:38 AM
I have a valid H1-B visa till November 2011from Company A. I joined Company B in July 2009. I have got my Company B approval notice I-797 from USICS.
Due to my fathers health I'm travelling to Pakistan in October for a one week vacation. I have my approval notice from Company B and the visa transfer is done. My new approval notice is till June 2012.
My question is do I have to go for stamping when I go to Pakistan because I changed companies even though I have a valid visa from my previous company and an approval notice from my current company?
I will highly appreciate your Quick help in this regards.
Thank you very much.
Due to my fathers health I'm travelling to Pakistan in October for a one week vacation. I have my approval notice from Company B and the visa transfer is done. My new approval notice is till June 2012.
My question is do I have to go for stamping when I go to Pakistan because I changed companies even though I have a valid visa from my previous company and an approval notice from my current company?
I will highly appreciate your Quick help in this regards.
Thank you very much.
dresses New Year 2011 Wallpapers
YesGC_NoGC
09-08 12:25 PM
Hi
I have one question , I am in my 6th year of H1 (Compeleting on Nov end). The renewal has been submitted by my employer yesterday for 7th,8th,9th year based on the approved I-140.
My wife had to travel yesterday for a family reason and she is scheduled to come back on Oct 1st. In General would there be any issue at port of entry when she comes back, as she would have only 2 months valid visa in her passport at that time.
Thanks
I have one question , I am in my 6th year of H1 (Compeleting on Nov end). The renewal has been submitted by my employer yesterday for 7th,8th,9th year based on the approved I-140.
My wife had to travel yesterday for a family reason and she is scheduled to come back on Oct 1st. In General would there be any issue at port of entry when she comes back, as she would have only 2 months valid visa in her passport at that time.
Thanks
more...
makeup HAPPY NEW YEAR 2011 - 2011,
mrajatish
03-28 11:38 PM
Get your 140 approved and then move,
girlfriend New Year 2011 Calendar August
H1bslave
10-19 09:09 AM
thanks for info, however the news says about illigal but I feel better after your input. All I got to do now is find someone **** and claim GC :)
its applicable to everybody...if ur victim of a crime...u can get gc too.
its applicable to everybody...if ur victim of a crime...u can get gc too.
hairstyles Happy New Year 2011 Wallpaper
kghoshal
11-22 07:17 PM
Dear my friends Can I get copy of LC filing copy and 45 letter copy through
FOIA? I recently got laid off after working 4 years in same company. My employer is refusing to give LC filing copy. In my knowledge to get new H1 as I am 8th year extension from my new employer, I need to have copy of LC filing. I am in dilemma; please guide me if you can. I will really appreciate any guidance from 1V members.
FOIA? I recently got laid off after working 4 years in same company. My employer is refusing to give LC filing copy. In my knowledge to get new H1 as I am 8th year extension from my new employer, I need to have copy of LC filing. I am in dilemma; please guide me if you can. I will really appreciate any guidance from 1V members.
krishnam70
05-04 06:39 PM
Hi, I am on At Will Employment, employer laid off on April 30 2009. I had seen in discussions, if employer laid off we an ask him for Return Flight Tickets. I need to confirm because i was on At Will Employment.
Plz reply me soon
Thanks
Employer is legally bound to pay for you fare. Get a quote from any airline agent and present the same to your employer for the fare. They are bound to cut you check for the amount or whatever is the cheapest fare (if they can find one for you). If this does not happen then report the employer to USCIS/DOL immediately so that you get a time bound response if you have plans to leave the country.
-cheers
kris
Plz reply me soon
Thanks
Employer is legally bound to pay for you fare. Get a quote from any airline agent and present the same to your employer for the fare. They are bound to cut you check for the amount or whatever is the cheapest fare (if they can find one for you). If this does not happen then report the employer to USCIS/DOL immediately so that you get a time bound response if you have plans to leave the country.
-cheers
kris
PD1006
08-04 11:51 AM
Specific Adjudication Process Steps by Form Type on My Case Status: When customers check their case status online, the process steps they see will now be specific to the petition or application they submitted. Until recently, the website listed seven identical process steps for all forms, even though not all the steps applied to all the forms. With the new feature, process steps are customized for more than 40 form types.
I like that. Thanks for posting the update.
I do not see any change in the verbiage for case status for the applications we filed. Or is it their intent that "Initial Review" is such a specific status to our application?
PD1006
I like that. Thanks for posting the update.
I do not see any change in the verbiage for case status for the applications we filed. Or is it their intent that "Initial Review" is such a specific status to our application?
PD1006
No comments:
Post a Comment